Este é um Blog educacional, dedicado a discussões acadêmicas sobre a Ecologia Evolutiva. Contém chamadas específicas relacionadas às disciplinas de Ecologia da Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, e textos didáticos gerais.
Segunda-feira, 2 de Março de 2009
DO's e DONT's in writing an article 1 of 3


Bem vindos às aulas! Começamos falando de FAZER ciência. Há uma diferença muito grande de quando assumimos ser parte da estruturação do conhecimento, se comparado com quando somos "consumidores" do conhecimento. Se está no caminho de construir suas IDÉIAS a partir de sua pesquisa (que sim, SÃO coisas diferentes - os dados gerados para responder as hipóteses de seus orientadores podem servir para responder a SUA hipótese também!), sua forma de ler também tem que mudar. Não mais irás ler somente pela informação que antes absorvia quase passivamente. Agora deve questionar o conhecimento, e estudar a sua forma de ser apresentado. Quer questionar tudo? Correto! Quer entender o formato? Corretíssimo! Há uma maneira de se portar diante do processo de submissão de artigos para publicação, uma das mais ritualísticas e isentas metodologias de formalização de autoria e de validação do conhecimento já pensado pelo mundo ocidental. Ainda muito imperfeita, embora bem funcional. Para aprender um pouco mais sobre estes ritos, transcrevo o artigo de Walsh e Mommsen nos próximos 3 posts. Boa leitura crítica!
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 152 (2009) 291292
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A
journal homepage:
1095-6433/$ see front matter © 2008 Published by Elsevier Inc.
The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers
We have presented versions of the material below at various
meetings as part of discussions for our junior colleagues who are
relatively new to the scientific publication process. While some of it
seems to be stating the obvious, based on submissions we sometimes
receive even from senior authors, we thought it might be helpful to
publish these tips in the form of Do'sand Don't's
examine the scope of the journal and description of its contents
before submitting.
You might be amazed at the number of inappropriatemanuscripts
editors receive and have to rapidly desk reject(without
review, or after a quick examination by an editorial board member)
simply because they don't address the interests of the journal's
audience. Some good questions to ask yourself in this regard are: Do
papers like yours appear in the journal? Have you cited papers that
have appeared in the journal or similar journals? If still in doubt, send
only the title, authors and abstract to the journal office for a quick
opinion on appropriateness, or even the whole paper. In the case of
CBP specifically, we are often asked Part A, B, C, or D?. The same
advice above applies.
format the paper appropriately.
There is the tendency amongst authors to say I'll format the paper
and reference style later, after it has been accepted. This is especially
true if a paper has previously been rejected by another journal whose
format is similar. If you pay attention to the details of the
appropriate format for the journal you are submitting to now, you
will have one fewer thing to be criticized about by both the editorial
staff and referees. In a paper that might be controversial, poor
format could just be the straw that breaks the camel's back and tips a
referee to tick the rejectbox.
look at costs.
Does the journal of choice levy page charges or submission fees, or
fees for color illustrations or photos, or reprint charges? Clear the
expenses up front with your advisor. You want to avoid the good
news your paper is accepted, bad news you owe us $700scenario. If
you are short of funds, many journals have an as affordablepolicy
that might subsidize some of your costs if you plead poverty. It can't
hurt to ask. CBP has no page charges or submission fees, and our
publisher sometimes allows us to grant free color if there are
mitigating factors and if the use of color is scientifically justified/
prepare a detailed cover letter.
You need to state that the manuscript is not being considered
elsewhere, that the data (or parts of the data set) have not been
published elsewhere, that you have the permission of all co-authors,
and other formal information. In addition, you should include a
sentence or two describing the novel finding, why you are so totally
excited about your work (the newsworthiness factor), and why you
think it would be appropriate for the journal. Make sure you have
appropriately addressed the cover letter! You would be amazed at
how many letters we receive addressed to the editor of another
journal (obviously the most recent place where the paper was
rejected). Not a very promising start.
suggest potential referees (up to 5 or 6) and an Editor and member
of the Editorial Board whom you think would best be suited to handle
your paper.
Of course it is the editor's prerogative to identify and assign
referees, but the reality is that journal staff members are overworked.
If you can do a little background work to help them, it will be
appreciated. Also, although journal editors and editorial board
members tend to be broadly trained and interested, they do not
know all fields equally well. By suggesting appropriate referees, you
maximize the chances that your manuscript will get knowledgeable
reviewers and not something out of context. Of course, avoid the
obvious conflicts of interests (researchers from the same institution,
folks who are very close collaborators of yours, folks who are simply
your buddies). A good question to ask: Have I cited papers by the
people I am suggesting as referees?This gives you confidence that
you have chosen appropriate people, and of course, human nature
being what it is, the referee will be chuffed that you have cited him or
her (assuming of course that you have appropriately and fairly
represented their published findings!).
Similar considerations apply to the choice of an appropriate
member of the editorial board. Often, when a manuscript is received,
the editor will directly assign it to an editorial board member for a
quick read (to see if it's appropriate) and to ask for referee
You don't want to make a habit of this, but: you can in fact suggest
people whom you do not want to review your paper, due to a personal
conflict, because they are an extreme competitor (not quite so much of
a problem in our comparative world), or simply because you feel from
prior experience that they are so opposed to your ideas as to not be
able to give a fair evaluation.
There is no guarantee that the Editors will heed any or all of your
suggestions, but there are times when we look at these lists and say:
great list, couldn't have done better myself, let's use them all.
Patrick J. Walsh*
University of Ottawa
Thomas P. Mommsen*
University of Victoria
Göran E. Nilsson
University of Oslo
*Corresponding authors.
E-mail addresses: (P.J. Walsh), (T.P. Mommsen), (G.E. Nilsson).

publicado por Sérvio Pontes Ribeiro às 19:47
link do post | comentar | favorito

posts recentes

Convite a visitar meu out...

material de aula por emai...

Mera observação

leitura de contraposição:...

Feliz dia dos professores

Para quem que notícias so...

Preparando para a prova

A mente do cientista e a ...

Resenha do livro " causa ...

Leitura para 14 de março ...

A euqação da Co-existênci...

Avaliação Final de Ecolog...

Para a prova final de Evo...

Belo Monte para cientista...

Seminários - Evolução da ...

Seminários - Evolução Hum...

SemináriosEvolução Bach 2...

Seminários Evol Bach 2011...

Seminários de Evolução 20...

orientações para a prova ...

Março 2013








Março 2013

Dezembro 2012

Novembro 2012

Outubro 2012

Agosto 2012

Abril 2012

Março 2012

Dezembro 2011

Novembro 2011

Outubro 2011

Setembro 2011

Agosto 2011

Julho 2011

Junho 2011

Maio 2011

Abril 2011

Dezembro 2010

Novembro 2010

Outubro 2010

Setembro 2010

Julho 2010

Maio 2010

Abril 2010

Março 2010

Dezembro 2009

Outubro 2009

Setembro 2009

Julho 2009

Abril 2009

Março 2009

Dezembro 2008

Novembro 2008

Outubro 2008

Setembro 2008

Julho 2008

Junho 2008

Maio 2008

Abril 2008

blogs SAPO
subscrever feeds